I did a lot of reading in the book, instead of the symballo page. It was easy for me to understand the facts. When I read in the book it is much easier to understand. I was very good at taking notes from the bored but it was harder to understand the notes for me. I worked well from puting the words from the book to puting the facts on the paper. I really liked making digrams on paper. I worked with will F really well on the bureacray. I got everything on the test I practiced it so many times. This time I choose to know them more then memorize them. I think the games really didn't show my understanding it did but not all of it. I did okay on the Unit but I really liked it.
I think I did pretty good on the whole skills Mesoptamia . I did very good memorizing terms. I think I was amazing answer the short essays . I liked learning Mesopatamia. I found the ideas in the pargraph quickly. S.S is not that tough of a subject. The map i did I just missed therivers. In s.s I don't need to study much because I am goods at parts and bad at parts. I still need to work on punctuation on the three short essays. I remembered to meemorize about the three empires. I did great on that. I duid okay on the true and false. I did greant on the geography and climate. I liked that partucliary.
Our first social studies unit was about archaeology and early civilization.
I did very well on memorizing the word. I am always pretty good with memorizing. I was good with knowing the terms. I got mixed up with 2 of them. I knew most of them. I wasn't that good on archaeology but I was great with civilization. I was good at the basics with archeology but I couldn’t put it together with archeology. I was great with basic information on the early civilization and putting ideas together. When it was talking about the dig I was really good with that. I really knew that off my mind. I really liked putting together the artifacts. I mostly was very good with this. When I compared both sites I really thought the question the other way around So, I didn’t put a answer that it make sense. I was good with the importance of all the stuff and the words. When I put all the ideas together I did a fantastic job. I think I liked it because I was more interested in early civilization. I understood it better. I really liked early civilization. When I read from the book I realized I had to chop it up from paragraph to paragraph or page to page. I liked our first unit.
I did a lot of reading in the book, instead of the symballo page. It was easy for me to understand the facts. When I read in the book it is much easier to understand. I was very good at taking notes from the bored but it was harder to understand the notes for me. I worked well from puting the words from the book to puting the facts on the paper. I really liked making digrams on paper. I worked with will F really well on the bureacray. I got everything on the test I practiced it so many times. This time I choose to know them more then memorize them. I think the games really didn't show my understanding it did but not all of it. I did okay on the Unit but I really liked it.
Egypt
Mesoptamia
I think I did pretty good on the whole skills Mesoptamia . I did very good memorizing terms. I think I was amazing answer the short essays . I liked learning Mesopatamia. I found the ideas in the pargraph quickly. S.S is not that tough of a subject. The map i did I just missed therivers. In s.s I don't need to study much because I am goods at parts and bad at parts. I still need to work on punctuation on the three short essays. I remembered to meemorize about the three empires. I did great on that. I duid okay on the true and false. I did greant on the geography and climate. I liked that partucliary.
Our first social studies unit was about archaeology and early civilization.
I did very well on memorizing the word. I am always pretty good with memorizing. I was good with knowing the terms. I got mixed up with 2 of them. I knew most of them. I wasn't that good on archaeology but I was great with civilization. I was good at the basics with archeology but I couldn’t put it together with archeology. I was great with basic information on the early civilization and putting ideas together. When it was talking about the dig I was really good with that. I really knew that off my mind. I really liked putting together the artifacts. I mostly was very good with this. When I compared both sites I really thought the question the other way around So, I didn’t put a answer that it make sense. I was good with the importance of all the stuff and the words. When I put all the ideas together I did a fantastic job. I think I liked it because I was more interested in early civilization. I understood it better. I really liked early civilization. When I read from the book I realized I had to chop it up from paragraph to paragraph or page to page. I liked our first unit.